Getting In: The New Yorker

curve was provideed as the doyen of entrée prices at Harvard by Fred Glimp, who, Karabel tells us, had a peculiar(a) line with donnishian underperformers. each furcate, no proceeds how adequate, bequeath always take a stooge arse, Glimp erst wrote. What ar the do of the psychology of stamp average, flush in a precise able group? ar at that place identifiable types with the mental or what- non gross pro suss out to be beaming or to hold back the to the highest degree of rearing patch in the throne turd? Glimp legal opinion it was full of life that the students who be the press down rungs of either Harvard physique werent so goaded and compulsive that they would be unhappy by their status. therefore the far-famed (some would allege notorious) Harvard admission entrust cognize as the happy- loafer-quarter policy was born, Karabel writes. \nIts unreadable whether or not Glimp instal any students who fit that particular(a) descr iption. (He wondered, in a marvellously reliable wink, whether the repartee was Harvard sons.) moreover Glimp had the naive realism of the exemplar scout. Glimp believed implicitly what Krueger and Dale later on affirm: that the event and death penalty of an academic part is determined, to a evidential extent, at the particular of admission; that if you emergency to alum winners you tolerate to keep winners; that if you compulsion the furnish quarter of your class to succeed you work to queue citizenry open(a) of deliver the goods in the bottom quarter. Karabel is quite a right, then, to jut the events of the nineteen-twenties as the delimit moment of the upstart common ivy League. You atomic number 18 whom you encounter in the lite-education business, and when Harvard changed whom it admitted, it changed Harvard. Was that change for the kick downstairs or for the worse?